高低收入阶层膳食健康上的不平等及其分解 ——“口味无争辩”?
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.东南大学公共卫生学院;2.耶鲁大学公共卫生学院;3.香港中文大学商学院;4.西南交通大学经济管理学院;5.四川大学经济学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

I12 I18 D63

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金青年项目(13CJY028);国家自然科学基金青年项目 (71603046) ;教育部人文社科规划项目(17YJA790016);四川大学中央高校基本科研 业务费研究专项项目(skq201717)


Measurement and Decomposition of the Inequality of the Dietary Health between the High-Income and Low-Income Classes: “De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum?”
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Public Health, Southeast University;2.School of Public Health, Yale University;3.The Chinese University of Hong Kong;4.Southwest Jiaotong University;5.School of Economics, Sichuan University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    我国高低收入阶层间存在着严重的膳食健康上的不平等现象,在讨论其背后的机制时,鲜有文献涉及到口味因素。传统理念认为口味差异天生给定,无需争辩;Becker开创性地认为可以用经济学工具争辩口味问题。本文采用中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)2010-2014年三期面板数据进行分析,通过加入个体固定效应的再中心化影响函数回归,消除了“不可争辩的口味”;再此基础上进行无条件分位数分解,将相同特征条件下系数不同导致的不平等定义为“可争辩的口味”效应。结果显示:在包含收入阶层流动的情况下,“可争辩的口味”和社会经济地位分别可以解释膳食健康不平等的54.3%和44.5%;在不包含收入阶层流动的情况下,二者分别可以解释37.1%和62.3%。人口学特征、个体健康、供给因素的作用很小。本文结论表明收入政策只能起到部分作用,政策制定者需要重视对口味的教育引导。这在“健康中国2030”背景下,对于促进全民健康有着重要启示。

    Abstract:

    There is a serious inequality of dietary health between the high-income and low-income classes in China, which is generally considered as an important issue facing this country right now. When inferring potential causes of this inequality, extant literature usually neglect the effect of an individual’s taste itself. Leveraging on the panel structure of CFPS 2010-2014 data, we employ recentered influence function (RIF) method to first eliminate individuals’ "inborn taste" through controlling for individual fixed effect, based on which we then conduct unconditional quantile decomposition to further separate the effects that is due to (1) individuals’ different characteristics (e.g. socioeconomic and demographic factors) and (2) individuals’ different marginal utility (i.e. coefficients) of such characteristic even if they hypothetically have the same characteristics, which we define as the effect of "alterable taste". We show that with the presence of income class mobility, "alterable taste" and socioeconomic status can explain 54.3% and 44.5% of the dietary health inequality, respectively; In the absence of income class mobility, the two different tastes can explain 37.1% and 62.3%. These results imply that government’s income policy can only partially influence individuals’ dietary health. The policy makers are suggested to invest more in taste education and helping individuals to foster a heathy and balanced diet.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-01
  • 最后修改日期:2019-06-28
  • 录用日期:2020-01-27
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者
管理科学学报 ® 2025 版权所有
通讯地址:天津市南开区卫津路92号天津大学第25教学楼A座908室 邮编:300072
联系电话/传真:022-27403197 电子信箱:jmsc@tju.edu.cn