不同贴息激励下的绿色信贷定价、企业碳减排决策及经济-环境价值分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.浙江财经大学;2.上海交通大学;3.南通大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F272

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金创新群体项目(72221001);国家自然科学基金面上(72171148;72372145);国家自然科学基金青年项目(72002191)


Green credit pricing, carbon emissions reduction decisions, and the associated economic-environmental value analysis under different interest subsidy incentives
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics;2.Shanghai Jiao Tong Univeristy;3.Nantong University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    向银行贴息和向借款企业贴息是政府支持企业低碳转型的两种绿色金融激励政策.本文研究碳减排企业存在资金约束时,两种不同的贴息激励下,银行在完全竞争和垄断竞争的金融市场中的贷款定价以及企业的产量和碳减排决策,并分别从经济-环境价值视角对比分析银行贴息和企业贴息.研究发现:(1)企业的减排技术、自有资金和碳资产水平会影响绿色信贷的经济-环境价值,并存在双正向价值的参数区间.(2)当企业进行无风险借贷时,两种贴息激励在经济和环境价值方面等价.(3)当企业存在违约风险且银行处于完全竞争的金融市场时,银行贴息在提升融资系统经济效益和促进碳减排方面均优于企业贴息;相反,当银行处于垄断的金融市场时,企业贴息优于银行贴息.

    Abstract:

    Interest subsidies to banks and enterprises are two types of green financial incentives that government supports enterprises in their low-carbon transition in practice. This paper investigates green loan pricing decisions of a bank in perfectly competitive and monopolistic financial market and a capital-constrained enterprise's production and carbon emission reduction decisions. Then, this paper compares the economic-environmental values contributed by green credit under two incentive policies. The research finds that: (1) The enterprise's emission-reduction technology, initial capital, and carbon asset levels will jointly affect the economic-environmental value of green credit. Moreover, there exist parameter regions in which green credit results in poisitive economic and environmental values. (2) When the enterprise borrows without default risk, the two interest subsidies are equivalent from economic and environmental perspectives. (3) When the enterprise borrows with default risk and the bank is in a perfectly competitive financial market, subsidizing the bank is superior to subsidizing the borrower on the sides of economic and environmental perspectives; the converse holds when the bank is in a monopolistic financial market.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-08
  • 最后修改日期:2024-05-29
  • 录用日期:2024-07-16
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者
管理科学学报 ® 2026 版权所有
通讯地址:天津市南开区卫津路92号天津大学第25教学楼A座908室 邮编:300072
联系电话/传真:022-27403197 电子信箱:jmsc@tju.edu.cn