考虑供应风险的竞合供应链决策研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.哈尔滨工程大学;2.黑龙江工商学院;3.贵州财经大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家社科基金重点项目(20AJY016);国家自然科学基金(72001057;72061004;72072046);教育部人文社科基金(19YJC630052);黑龙江省自然科学基金(LH2020G003);黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究规划项目(20GLC205);中央高校基本科研业务费项目(3072021CFW0901;3072021CFT0902;3072021CFW0905)。


Equilibrium Decision for Co-opetition Supply Chains with Supply Risk
Author:
Affiliation:

1.哈尔滨工程大学;2.Heilongjiang College of Business And Technology;3.Guizhou University of Finance and Economics

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    随着供应链的全球化和商业环境的瞬息万变,如何应对供应风险,是企业运作管理中需考虑的核心问题之一。本文采用建模分析法研究了近年来运作实践中新出现的一种风险应对策略——与对手合作,并建立了如下供应链竞合模型:模型考虑一个产品制造商需向一个具有随机中断风险的供应商采购某种核心零部件以制成产品,并与对手在市场上展开竞争,其中对手是一个能够自己生产该零件并制成产品的集成制造商;在供应商的供应中断发生后,产品制造商可以从竞争对手处对零部件进行补货。研究发现,在上游供应商获得订单且发生供应中断的前提下,两个制造商之间的补货合作一定会达成,这意味着补货合作选项具有风险应对效应。然而从总体上看,依赖于市场潜能、供应的可靠性、产品间的替代性以及成本的大小,两个制造商之间的竞争与合作既可能共存,也可能互斥(即只竞争不合作或只合作不竞争)。除此之外,区别于既往文献的经典研究结论——“下游企业紧急补货选项的存在使具有供应风险的(上游)主供应商获得的订货量减少”,本文在引入供应链竞合之后却发现:补货合作选项的存在竟然会使具有供应风险的上游供应商获得的订货量增加,即两个制造商之间的合作具有向上的溢出效应。而且本文还发现,与没有合作选项的情形相比,合作的存在使两个制造商投放到市场的产品总量增加,即两个竞争性制造商之间的补货合作还具有向下的溢出效应——降低了市场价格从而提高了消费者剩余。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: With the globalization of supply chains and the rapid changes in the business environment, how to deal with supply risks is one of the core issues that need to be considered in the operation management of enterprises. Considering the upstream disruption risk, we investigate a co-opetition problem in which an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) can replenish components from his rival, the integrated device manufacturer (IDM), after the random disruption of the OEM's supplier is realized. The IDM is perfectly reliable. We observe that, under the premise that the upstream supplier obtains the order and the supply is disrupted, the replenishment cooperation between the two manufacturers will be reached. However, from the holistic perspective, depending on the market potential, supply reliability, product substitution, and cost, the competition and cooperation between the two manufacturers may coexist or be mutually exclusive. In addition, it is different from the results of the previous literature: the existence of backup replenishment option for downstream company reduces the order quantity obtained by the (upstream) supplier with supply risk. After introducing competition and cooperation, we find that the existence of replenishment cooperation option can increase the order quantity obtained by the upstream supplier with supply risk; that is, the cooperation between the two manufacturers has an upward spillover effect. Furthermore, we find that the cooperation increases the total quantity of products put on the market by the two manufacturers; that is, the replenishment cooperation between the two competing manufacturers also has a downward spillover effect: reduce market prices and increase consumer surplus.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-29
  • 最后修改日期:2021-10-22
  • 录用日期:2021-12-31
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者
管理科学学报 ® 2025 版权所有
通讯地址:天津市南开区卫津路92号天津大学第25教学楼A座908室 邮编:300072
联系电话/传真:022-27403197 电子信箱:jmsc@tju.edu.cn