中国关税有效保护率的动态变迁
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.湖南大学经济与贸易学院;2.湖南大学金融与统计学院;3.中国社会科学院经济研究所

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F74

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目(71673083); 国家社科基金重大项目(16ZDA038)


Dynamic Evolution in China’s Effective Protection Rate
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Economics and Trade, Hunan University;2.School of Finance and Statistics, Hunan University;3.Institute of Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    全球价值链分工和区域贸易自由化的发展对有效保护率的测度提出了新的挑战.本文在全球多区域投入产出框架中构建新的有效保护率测度方法,整理双边产业关税数据库,揭示中国关税有效保护率的最新发展趋势,并就中美贸易摩擦及其可能的应对情景进行模拟分析.研究表明:2000-2014年,中国的总体有效保护率从22.25%下降至12.56%,中国国内生产者面临的国际竞争正日益增强.产业的有效保护率水平与产业增加值占GDP比重变化呈正相关关系,关税的资源配置效应明显.但有效保护率的产业间差异呈缩小趋势,借助关税政策引导产业间资源配置的政策空间在缩窄.中美贸易摩擦会提升中国落后产能较为集中的化学原料及其制品业的有效保护率,为供给侧改革带来不利影响,同时也会降低具有劳动密集型特征的纺织品、服装和皮革制品业的有效保护率,从而对就业造成冲击.不论中国加入CPTPP还是RECP,均可以一定程度上平抑中美贸易摩擦在一些产业引起的有效保护率变化,有助于缓解中美贸易摩擦的负面影响.

    Abstract:

    The development of global value chains and regional trade liberalization poses new challenges to the measurement of effective protection rate (EPR). This paper constructs a new EPR measurement method in the Global Multi-regional Input-output Model, and develops Bilateral Industry Tariff Database to reveal the latest trends in China's EPR, conduct simulate analysis on Sino-US trade friction and its possible future scenarios. The results show that from 2000 to 2014, China's overall EPR fell from 22.25% to 12.56%, thus, the producers in China are facing a more and more competitive situation. Industrial EPR is positively correlated with the change of the ratio of industrial value added to GDP, so the resource allocation effect of tariff is obvious. However, the inter-industry differences in EPR are shrinking, means that the policy space for tariff measures in allocating resource is narrowing. The Sino-US trade friction will increase the EPR of the chemical raw materials, an industry contains many backward production capacity, which will have adversely effect on supply-side reforms, and will also reduce the EPR of some labor-intensive industries, such as textile, apparel and leather products industries, and shock employment. Both CPTPP and RECP can alleviate the change of EPR caused by Sino-US trade friction in some industries, and help alleviate the negative impact of Sino-US trade friction.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-14
  • 最后修改日期:2020-05-03
  • 录用日期:2020-05-03
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者
管理科学学报 ® 2025 版权所有
通讯地址:天津市南开区卫津路92号天津大学第25教学楼A座908室 邮编:300072
联系电话/传真:022-27403197 电子信箱:jmsc@tju.edu.cn