中国ETF期权Delta对冲收益的日夜特征研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.中山大学岭南学院;2.华宝基金管理有限公司

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目)


Research on the Intra-day and Overnight Characteristics of ETF Options Delta Hedging Returns
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Lingnan College, Sun Yat-sen University;2.Fortune Sg Fund Management Co.,ltd

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    期权市场是现代金融市场的重要组成部分,研究期权市场Delta对冲收益的日夜特征,对于理解期权市场运行机制以及降低金融市场风险具有重要意义。本文使用我国2015~2021年股票ETF期权数据,研究了期权Delta对冲收益的日夜特征。研究结果表明,总体上Delta对冲的隔夜收益为负、日内收益不显著;认购期权和认沽期权的Delta对冲收益具有非对称性,即认购期权日内为负、隔夜为正,而认沽期权恰好相反。即使替换为基于波动率和标的资产价格关系的对冲模型,非对称性异象仍然存在。这些发现不同于美国期权市场的Delta对冲收益日内为正、隔夜为负的特征。本文进一步探讨了可能的成因:从风险溢价看,波动率风险溢价可以解释总体上负的隔夜对冲收益,但是不能解释Delta对冲收益的非对称性;从模型误差看,模型误差与标的资产收益共同作用影响了Delta对冲收益;从交易制度看,T+1交易制度约束造成了标的资产日夜收益反转,进而导致了对冲收益的非对称性,并且T+1交易制度约束越强,对冲收益的非对称性越明显。本文将丰富我国期权市场Delta对冲效率、交易制度对金融市场影响的相关研究,有利于提高投资者的风险管理水平、增进监管者对市场行为的理解,从而推动中国多层次资本市场的高质量发展。

    Abstract:

    Options market is an important part of modern financial market. Studying the day-night characteristics of Delta hedging returns in the options market is of great significance for understanding the operation mechanism of the options market and reducing financial market risks. This paper investigates the day-night characteristics of option Delta hedge returns using China's stock ETF option data from 2015 to 2021. The results of the study show that, overall the overnight returns of Delta hedging are negative and the intraday returns are insignificant; the Delta hedging returns of call and put options are asymmetric, that is, call options are negative in the day and positive in the night, while put options are exactly the opposite. The asymmetry anomaly persists even when replaced with a hedging model based on the relationship between volatility and the underlying asset price. These findings are different from the characteristics of Delta hedging returns in the US option market, which are positive during the day and negative overnight. This paper further explores possible causes: in terms of risk premium, volatility risk premium can explain the overall negative overnight hedging returns, but cannot explain the asymmetry of delta hedging returns; in terms of model error, model error and underlying asset returns jointly affect delta hedging returns; in terms of trading rules, T+1 trading rule causes the reversal of the underlying asset's day and night returns, which in turn leads to the asymmetry of hedging returns, and the stronger the T+1 trading rule constraint is, the more obvious the asymmetry of hedging returns is. This article will enrich relevant research on Delta hedging efficiency in China’s option market and the impact of trading systems on financial markets, which is conducive to improving investors’ risk management level and enhancing regulators’ understanding of market behavior, thereby promoting high-quality development of China’s multi-level capital market.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-18
  • 最后修改日期:2023-08-01
  • 录用日期:2023-08-14
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者
管理科学学报 ® 2025 版权所有
通讯地址:天津市南开区卫津路92号天津大学第25教学楼A座908室 邮编:300072
联系电话/传真:022-27403197 电子信箱:jmsc@tju.edu.cn