面向碳中和目标的中国工业部门减排路径与战略选择
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.复旦大学经济学院,复旦大学泛海国际金融学院;2.复旦大学经济学院,耶鲁大学麦克米兰国际与地区研究中心;3.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,中国科学院大学资源与环境学院,华威大学商学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F124

基金项目:

国家自科基金创新研究群体项目“中国经济发展规律与治理机制研究”(72121002)、教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“基于中国实践的绿色发展理论研究”( 22JJD790058)、耶鲁大学福克斯国际学者项目(Yale Fox International Fellowship)


Strategic Measures and Pathway towards China’s Industrial Carbon Neutrality
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Economics, Fudan University;2.Fanhai International School of Finance, Fudan University;3.The Whitney and Betty MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies, Yale University;4.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences;5.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences;6.Warwick Business School, University of Warwick

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    工业部门(包含电力工业)是中国碳排放量最多的国民经济部门。探寻工业部门合理有效的碳减排路径是中国碳达峰、碳中和目标顺利实现的关键。本文分解了中国2000—2019年工业碳排放历史演变路径的驱动因素,预测了三种情景下2019—2060年工业碳排放的潜在演变路径,估计了工业部门碳中和进程中所需的投资额,讨论了不同减排时点选择下投资需求的异质性。研究发现:1)规模效应和效率效应是历史演变路径中最关键的驱动因素,而化石能源清洁转化效应、化石能源内部结构效应和清洁能源替代效应的影响较小;2)非电力工业未来核心的碳减排技术路径为能源效率提升和清洁能源消费替代,电力工业未来核心的碳减排技术路径则为清洁能源发电替代;3)在当前的技术水平下,工业部门碳中和的进程中需要超过300万亿元的巨额投资,所需投资主要集中于高排放的非电力工业。本文最后提出了“以技术为核心,以市场为机制,以政策为引导”的中国工业部门实现碳中和的战略选择。

    Abstract:

    Industry (including electric power industry) is China’s largest source of carbon emissions. Exploring a reasonable and effective pathway of industrial emission reduction is the key to the smooth realization of China's carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals. This paper decomposes the driving factors of the historical evolution path of China's industrial carbon emissions from 2000 to 2019, predicts the potential evolution path of industrial carbon emissions from 2019 to 2060 under various scenarios, estimates the amount of investment required in the process of carbon neutrality, and discusses the heterogeneity of required investment for different emissions abatement timing options. The research finds that: 1) Scale effect and efficiency effect are the most critical driving factors in the historical evolution path, while the clean conversion of fossil energy, the internal structural change of fossil fuels, and the clean energy substitution have less influence; 2) The future core emission reduction technology path of non-power industry is energy efficiency improvement and clean energy consumption substitution, while the future core path of electric power industry is clean energy generation substitution; 3) At the current technological level, the process of industrial carbon neutrality requires a huge investment of more than 300 trillion yuan, which is mainly concentrated in the carbon-intensive non-electric industry. At the end of this paper, the strategic choice of realizing China's industrial carbon neutrality is put forward, which is "technology as the core, market as the mechanism, and policy as the guidance".

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-04
  • 最后修改日期:2023-03-09
  • 录用日期:2023-03-27
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者
管理科学学报 ® 2025 版权所有
通讯地址:天津市南开区卫津路92号天津大学第25教学楼A座908室 邮编:300072
联系电话/传真:022-27403197 电子信箱:jmsc@tju.edu.cn